La lettre de la Preuve |
|
ISSN 1292-8763 |
|
1999 |
Balacheff N. (1999) Contract and Custom: Two registers of didactical interaction (trans. and ed. by P. Herbst). The Mathematics Educator (University of Georgia) 9(2) 23-29. |
|
Campbell S. (1999) The problem of unity and the emergence of physics, mathematics, and logic in ancient Greek thought. In: Lentz L., Winchester, I. (eds.) Towards scientific literacy (Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on History and Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching, pp. 143-152) -- ISBN 0-88953-223-0 |
|
Furinghetti F., Paola D. (1999) Shadows of the semantic context on the students' mathematical proofs. In: Lentz L., Winchester, I. (eds.) Towards scientific literacy (Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on History and Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching, pp. 272-279) -- ISBN 0-88953-223-0. |
|
Hanna G. (1999) Some factors in the decline of proof in the curriculum. In: Lentz L., Winchester, I. (eds.) Towards scientific literacy (Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on History and Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching, pp. 345-352) -- ISBN 0-88953-223-0. |
|
Harel G., Sowder L. (1999) Students' proof schemes. In: Lentz L., Winchester I. (eds.) Towards scientific literacy (Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on History and Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching, pp. 354-396) -- ISBN 0-88953-223-0. |
|
Luengo V. (1999) A semi-empirical agent for learning mathematical proof. In: Lajoie P., Vivet M. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence and Education (pp. 475-482). Amsterdam: IOS Press -- Tokyo: Ohmsha. |
|
Melis E., Leron U. (1999) A proof presentation suitable for teaching proofs. In: Lajoie P., Vivet M. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence and Education (pp. 483-490). Amsterdam: IOS Press -- Tokyo: Ohmsha. |
1998 |
Douek N. (1998) Some remarks about argumentation and mathematical proof and their educational implications. First CERME international conference. Osnabrück, Germany. |
|
Koedinger K. R. (1998) Conjecturing and argumentation in high school geometry students. In Lehrer, R. and Chazan D. (eds.) New Directions in the Teaching and Learning of Geometry. Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
Archives |
Chemla K. (1991) Theoretical aspects of the Chinese algorithmique tradition (first to third century). Historia scientiarum. 42, 75-98 (+errata) |
|
Chemla K. (1992) Résonance entre démonstration et procédure. Remarques sur le commentaire de Liu Hui (3ième s.) aux Neuf Chapitres sur les Procédures Mathématiques (1ier s.). Extrême-Orient, Extrême-Occident 14, 91-129. |
|
Chemla K. (1996) Relations between procedure and demonstration. Measuring the circle in the Nine Chapters on Mathematical Procedures and their commentaries by Liu Hui (3rd century). History of mathematics and Education: Ideas and Experiences (pp. 69-112). Göttingen: Vandenboeek and Ruprecht. |
|
Chemla K. (1997) What is at stake in mathematical proofs from the third century China. Science in Context 10(2) 227-251. |
|
de Villiers M. (1997) A Fibonacci Generalization: A Lakatosian Example. PME XXI (Vol.1 p.269). Lahti, Finland. |
|
Koedinger K.R., Anderson J.R. (1991) Interaction of deductive and inductive reasoning strategies in geometry novices. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale: NJ: Erlbaum. |
|
Toulmin S. E. (1993) Les Usages de l'Argumentation (Traduit de l'anglais, 1958, par Ph. deBrabauter). Paris : PUF. |
|
|
|
|
||
The TSG-12 activities will encompass the following issues: I. The importance of explanation, justification, and proof in mathematics education; These issues will be considered from the following points of view: (a) Historical and epistemological, related to the nature of mathematical proof and its functions in mathematics in an historical perspective; Selected contributions will introduce discussions on the different issues.
The Proof Newsletter website will host these contributions which will then be accessible through that chanel. Interested people are invited to join the first round of
debate as soon as possible and hence, to send their
contributions before december the
15th. |
|